<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting Rogue Deck: Green/White Aggro for Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magicgameplan.com/blog/gw-aggro-2009-ohio-regionals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/gw-aggro-2009-ohio-regionals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/gw-aggro-2009-ohio-regionals/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 01:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/gw-aggro-2009-ohio-regionals/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the surprise factor is why I like playing rogue decks.  

I think this deck would do well against Faeries.  Faeries seems to struggle against super aggressive decks.  Lark is probably a bad matchup especially game 1 because of Wrath of God, Lark, and Sower.  Snakeform is good in the sideboard but it&#039;s probably not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the surprise factor is why I like playing rogue decks.  </p>
<p>I think this deck would do well against Faeries.  Faeries seems to struggle against super aggressive decks.  Lark is probably a bad matchup especially game 1 because of Wrath of God, Lark, and Sower.  Snakeform is good in the sideboard but it&#8217;s probably not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/gw-aggro-2009-ohio-regionals/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/gw-aggro-2009-ohio-regionals/#comment-754</guid>
		<description>I really like this deck (I&#039;m putting my vendetta against Chameleon Colossus aside when I say this). 

I think it did so well is because it is a bit off main path and plays a lot of great cards. I think most players have trouble dealing with decks they don&#039;t expect. I also heard that the Columbus regionals saw a lot of Bant variants. There were very few and none at the top tables in Pittsburgh. I wonder how this deck matched up against faeries and revelark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this deck (I&#8217;m putting my vendetta against Chameleon Colossus aside when I say this). </p>
<p>I think it did so well is because it is a bit off main path and plays a lot of great cards. I think most players have trouble dealing with decks they don&#8217;t expect. I also heard that the Columbus regionals saw a lot of Bant variants. There were very few and none at the top tables in Pittsburgh. I wonder how this deck matched up against faeries and revelark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
