<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Practice Session #2: Building a Shards of Alara Sealed Deck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:29:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Running 5-color control in seald is just to risky.  When you&#039;re playing 7-8 rounds in a PTQ with a 5c deck, you have a much higher chance of getting screwed on land in crucial games, and losing.  I&#039;ve done well building a consistent 3 or 3c with a splash as my registered deck, and making a greedier deck that I can sideboard into if I feel an opponents deck is to slow, or just bad.  Thats my 2 cents on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running 5-color control in seald is just to risky.  When you&#8217;re playing 7-8 rounds in a PTQ with a 5c deck, you have a much higher chance of getting screwed on land in crucial games, and losing.  I&#8217;ve done well building a consistent 3 or 3c with a splash as my registered deck, and making a greedier deck that I can sideboard into if I feel an opponents deck is to slow, or just bad.  Thats my 2 cents on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-627</guid>
		<description>2x Resounding Silence
1x Knight of the Skyward Eye
1x Excomunicate
1x Oblivion Ring
1x Gift of the Gargantuan
1x Feral Hydra
2x Resounding Wave
1x Tidehollow Strix
1x Agony Warp
1x Tower Gargoyle
1x Ethersworn Cannonist
1x Steelclad Serpent
1x Puppet Conjurer
1x Scavenger Drake
1x Esper Battlemage
1x Dredgescape Zombie
1x Viscera Dragger
1x Blister Beetle
1x Jhessian Lookout
1x Obelisk of Esper
1x Obelisk of Bant

1x Esper Panorama
1x Crumbling Necropolis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2x Resounding Silence<br />
1x Knight of the Skyward Eye<br />
1x Excomunicate<br />
1x Oblivion Ring<br />
1x Gift of the Gargantuan<br />
1x Feral Hydra<br />
2x Resounding Wave<br />
1x Tidehollow Strix<br />
1x Agony Warp<br />
1x Tower Gargoyle<br />
1x Ethersworn Cannonist<br />
1x Steelclad Serpent<br />
1x Puppet Conjurer<br />
1x Scavenger Drake<br />
1x Esper Battlemage<br />
1x Dredgescape Zombie<br />
1x Viscera Dragger<br />
1x Blister Beetle<br />
1x Jhessian Lookout<br />
1x Obelisk of Esper<br />
1x Obelisk of Bant</p>
<p>1x Esper Panorama<br />
1x Crumbling Necropolis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winz</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Winz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>1x feral Hydra
1x Knight of the Skyward Eye
1x Agony Warp
1x Puppet Conjurer
1x Jund Battlemage
1x Wolly Thoctar
1x Naya Charm
1x Exuberant Firestoker
1x Oblivion Ring
1x Gift of the Gargantuan
1 each of Obelisk of Esper/Naya/Grixis
1x Fire-Fiend Ogre
1x Tower Gargoyle
2x Resounding Silence
2x Bloodpyre Elemental
1x Kiss of the Amesha
1x Cavern Thoctar
1x Ridge Rannet
1x Archdemon of Unx

1x Bant Panorama
1x Esper Panorama
1x Crumbling Necropolis

My 5-color build
Decided on 3x Obelisk.
Defending some of my card exclusions...

Jund Charm-Not good enough for sealed.
2x Resounding wave-Silence is just better
Tidehollow Strix-meh not gonna win you the game
Scavenger Drake and Viscera were my last cuts. And I really want to play both of them.

Godtoucher should never see play in any deck...ever. Ever.

However, you and I ended up with very similar builds...but thats to be expected with 5-color.

Was fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1x feral Hydra<br />
1x Knight of the Skyward Eye<br />
1x Agony Warp<br />
1x Puppet Conjurer<br />
1x Jund Battlemage<br />
1x Wolly Thoctar<br />
1x Naya Charm<br />
1x Exuberant Firestoker<br />
1x Oblivion Ring<br />
1x Gift of the Gargantuan<br />
1 each of Obelisk of Esper/Naya/Grixis<br />
1x Fire-Fiend Ogre<br />
1x Tower Gargoyle<br />
2x Resounding Silence<br />
2x Bloodpyre Elemental<br />
1x Kiss of the Amesha<br />
1x Cavern Thoctar<br />
1x Ridge Rannet<br />
1x Archdemon of Unx</p>
<p>1x Bant Panorama<br />
1x Esper Panorama<br />
1x Crumbling Necropolis</p>
<p>My 5-color build<br />
Decided on 3x Obelisk.<br />
Defending some of my card exclusions&#8230;</p>
<p>Jund Charm-Not good enough for sealed.<br />
2x Resounding wave-Silence is just better<br />
Tidehollow Strix-meh not gonna win you the game<br />
Scavenger Drake and Viscera were my last cuts. And I really want to play both of them.</p>
<p>Godtoucher should never see play in any deck&#8230;ever. Ever.</p>
<p>However, you and I ended up with very similar builds&#8230;but thats to be expected with 5-color.</p>
<p>Was fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the creatures in this pool were pretty bad lol.

I did see your deck in your PTQ tournament report.  I didn&#039;t realize this before.  You had multiple Resounding spells and you cycled them a bunch of times.  Plus, you had an eight drop, Prince of Thralls.

Having 20 or more mana sources may be the right call with 3 or more Resounding spells. 

It&#039;s weird.  I&#039;ve played many Resounding spells but I&#039;ve cycled them only three times.  And that&#039;s over 30+ matches!

In your deck of this pool, you included both Resounding Waves while I didn&#039;t.  This means you have 2 extra cards that can be played at eight mana.  I&#039;ve never played Resounding Wave.  It doesn&#039;t seem that strong to me, but I could be wrong.  There was always a better card imo whenever I played blue.

Anyways, good luck at your PTQ!  I hope you write another tournament report.  The first one was great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the creatures in this pool were pretty bad lol.</p>
<p>I did see your deck in your PTQ tournament report.  I didn&#8217;t realize this before.  You had multiple Resounding spells and you cycled them a bunch of times.  Plus, you had an eight drop, Prince of Thralls.</p>
<p>Having 20 or more mana sources may be the right call with 3 or more Resounding spells. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s weird.  I&#8217;ve played many Resounding spells but I&#8217;ve cycled them only three times.  And that&#8217;s over 30+ matches!</p>
<p>In your deck of this pool, you included both Resounding Waves while I didn&#8217;t.  This means you have 2 extra cards that can be played at eight mana.  I&#8217;ve never played Resounding Wave.  It doesn&#8217;t seem that strong to me, but I could be wrong.  There was always a better card imo whenever I played blue.</p>
<p>Anyways, good luck at your PTQ!  I hope you write another tournament report.  The first one was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gifts Ungiven</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Gifts Ungiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I do think I went a little low in creatures on that build, but I was just that unenthused with the creatures in the pool.

In my first PTQ of this season, I ran 17 land, 12 creatures, 7 general-purpose spells, and 4 obelisks. Although that is 21 non-creature mana sources, I didn&#039;t find flooding an issue, and I did find the obelisk-based acceleration pretty valuable.

I&#039;ll be attending at least one more PTQ toward the latter end of this season, schedule permitting. There&#039;s one about 2 hours away in early December, and another locally in late December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think I went a little low in creatures on that build, but I was just that unenthused with the creatures in the pool.</p>
<p>In my first PTQ of this season, I ran 17 land, 12 creatures, 7 general-purpose spells, and 4 obelisks. Although that is 21 non-creature mana sources, I didn&#8217;t find flooding an issue, and I did find the obelisk-based acceleration pretty valuable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be attending at least one more PTQ toward the latter end of this season, schedule permitting. There&#8217;s one about 2 hours away in early December, and another locally in late December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Here is the link to the plugin: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.backseatsurfer.de/wp-mtg-helper/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WP MtG-Helper&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Here is the link to the plugin: <a href="http://www.backseatsurfer.de/wp-mtg-helper/" rel="nofollow">WP MtG-Helper</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Huelsman</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Huelsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-526</guid>
		<description>That is a great feature you have that allows me to highlight a card and see it display. Is that a wordpress plugin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a great feature you have that allows me to highlight a card and see it display. Is that a wordpress plugin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>I like to do what you did.  It&#039;s good practice to build sealed decks out of other people&#039;s card pools and compare your deck to theirs.

You have an interesting build.  I can see some great draws with an early Glaze Fiend and then a flurry of artifacts.  

I do think it is a mistake to have less than 14 creatures.  My theory is that you need a lot of creatures in this format because there are a lot of common removal spells.  

Also, in my experience, 20 non-creature mana sources is too much unless you have a lot of card draw.  It&#039;s too easy to get mana flooded.

But anyways, thanks for your comment.  

By the way, are you going to another limited PTQ this season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to do what you did.  It&#8217;s good practice to build sealed decks out of other people&#8217;s card pools and compare your deck to theirs.</p>
<p>You have an interesting build.  I can see some great draws with an early Glaze Fiend and then a flurry of artifacts.  </p>
<p>I do think it is a mistake to have less than 14 creatures.  My theory is that you need a lot of creatures in this format because there are a lot of common removal spells.  </p>
<p>Also, in my experience, 20 non-creature mana sources is too much unless you have a lot of card draw.  It&#8217;s too easy to get mana flooded.</p>
<p>But anyways, thanks for your comment.  </p>
<p>By the way, are you going to another limited PTQ this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gifts Ungiven</title>
		<link>http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Gifts Ungiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magicgameplan.com/blog/practice-session-2-shards-sealed/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>That is an ugly card pool. I stopped after the pool, built my own deck from it, then moved on to the rest of your post. I chose to go for consistency in my control, because none of the red or green cards felt like they merited a splash. Here&#039;s my build:

Creatures: (10)

Etherium Sculptor
Jhessian Lookout
Blister Beetle
Glaze Fiend
Puppet Conjurer
Tidehollow Strix
Esper Battlemage
Viscera Dragger
Tower Gargoyle
Archdemon of Unx

Spells: (13)

Agony Warp
Hindering Light
Obelisk of Bant
Obelisk of Esper
Obelisk of Grixis
Excommunicate
Oblivion Ring
2 Resounding Wave
Onyx Goblet
2 Resounding Silence
Kiss of the Amesha

Land: (17)

1 Bant Panorama
1 Crumbling Necropolis
1 Esper Panorama
4 Plains
5 Island
5 Swamp

My goal is to control the heck out of things, keep their bombs off the board, and then beat them to death with little dorks, as the only vaguely aggressive creatures here are the Gargoyle and the Archdemon.

Good luck at your PTQ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an ugly card pool. I stopped after the pool, built my own deck from it, then moved on to the rest of your post. I chose to go for consistency in my control, because none of the red or green cards felt like they merited a splash. Here&#8217;s my build:</p>
<p>Creatures: (10)</p>
<p>Etherium Sculptor<br />
Jhessian Lookout<br />
Blister Beetle<br />
Glaze Fiend<br />
Puppet Conjurer<br />
Tidehollow Strix<br />
Esper Battlemage<br />
Viscera Dragger<br />
Tower Gargoyle<br />
Archdemon of Unx</p>
<p>Spells: (13)</p>
<p>Agony Warp<br />
Hindering Light<br />
Obelisk of Bant<br />
Obelisk of Esper<br />
Obelisk of Grixis<br />
Excommunicate<br />
Oblivion Ring<br />
2 Resounding Wave<br />
Onyx Goblet<br />
2 Resounding Silence<br />
Kiss of the Amesha</p>
<p>Land: (17)</p>
<p>1 Bant Panorama<br />
1 Crumbling Necropolis<br />
1 Esper Panorama<br />
4 Plains<br />
5 Island<br />
5 Swamp</p>
<p>My goal is to control the heck out of things, keep their bombs off the board, and then beat them to death with little dorks, as the only vaguely aggressive creatures here are the Gargoyle and the Archdemon.</p>
<p>Good luck at your PTQ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

