Comments on: Why Vampires is a Good Choice For Standard http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/ Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:35:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dee http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1974 Dee Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:27:54 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1974 It's a lot worse in my opinion. It dies to Bolt and doesn't give flying. Nocturnus was great because it was often a 5/4 and gave your other Vampires flying and +2/+1. That's like an Overrun on a 5/4 body :) It’s a lot worse in my opinion. It dies to Bolt and doesn’t give flying. Nocturnus was great because it was often a 5/4 and gave your other Vampires flying and +2/+1. That’s like an Overrun on a 5/4 body :)

]]> By: Vince http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1953 Vince Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:42:11 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1953 What are your feelings on Captivating Vampire from 2011? Since Nocturnus was not reprinted andhe could be a viable replacement. What are your feelings on Captivating Vampire from 2011? Since Nocturnus was not reprinted andhe could be a viable replacement.

]]> By: Dee http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1928 Dee Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:11:31 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1928 Sadly, I don't see Vampires getting anything that good in M11. I could be wrong though. Sadly, I don’t see Vampires getting anything that good in M11. I could be wrong though.

]]> By: Mark http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1915 Mark Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:38:39 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1915 I love this vampire deck and have had some success with an almost identical build. What will you change now m11 is out? I'm hoping to get a few months out of this deck before we lose nocturnus! I love this vampire deck and have had some success with an almost identical build. What will you change now m11 is out? I’m hoping to get a few months out of this deck before we lose nocturnus!

]]> By: Dee http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1899 Dee Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:12:18 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1899 The fetchlands are there to trigger bloodghast and to shuffle the deck to get a non-land on top for Nocturnus. The fetchlands are there to trigger bloodghast and to shuffle the deck to get a non-land on top for Nocturnus.

]]> By: Doug http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1877 Doug Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:42:26 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1877 I'm fairly new to magic. With that in mind, could someone explain why the OP had 4 Marsh Flats and 4 Verdant Catacombs in a mono-black deck? Why not just include 24 swamps? I’m fairly new to magic. With that in mind, could someone explain why the OP had 4 Marsh Flats and 4 Verdant Catacombs in a mono-black deck? Why not just include 24 swamps?

]]> By: Dee http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1773 Dee Sun, 27 Jun 2010 05:50:33 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1773 Corrupt seems good for casual play. Vampires get a new tribal lord in M11. Good point about Hexmages. They are solid in today's metagame. Corrupt seems good for casual play. Vampires get a new tribal lord in M11. Good point about Hexmages. They are solid in today’s metagame.

]]> By: MIke http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1767 MIke Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:23:00 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1767 why not try corrupt in casual play? tendrils will be leaving m10 and corrupt will be coming in m11, also nocturnus is not supposed to be re-released in m11, so vampires lose tribal lord in standard. i run a vampire decks and instead of using 4 bloodwitches i run 2 drana and 2 bloodwitch. i prefer Sorin over Liliana because of his second ability. i also like 3 hexmages because of PW kill and fs abilities. Your thoughts on the matter why not try corrupt in casual play? tendrils will be leaving m10 and corrupt will be coming in m11, also nocturnus is not supposed to be re-released in m11, so vampires lose tribal lord in standard. i run a vampire decks and instead of using 4 bloodwitches i run 2 drana and 2 bloodwitch. i prefer Sorin over Liliana because of his second ability. i also like 3 hexmages because of PW kill and fs abilities.

Your thoughts on the matter

]]> By: Dee http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1741 Dee Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:14:44 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1741 Hm, those cards are tough to replace, but you could try the following cards instead if you decide not to buy them: Black Knight Tendrils of Corruption Consuming Vapors Hm, those cards are tough to replace, but you could try the following cards instead if you decide not to buy them:

Black Knight
Tendrils of Corruption
Consuming Vapors

]]> By: cisco http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-1740 cisco Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:00:17 +0000 http://magicgameplan.com/blog/vampires-for-mtg-standard/#comment-1740 yea i dont have the full set of that or nocturnus but i was thinking of just buying them any way yea i dont have the full set of that or nocturnus but i was thinking of just buying them any way

]]>